The effect that a building creates
by turning a corner is determined by a number of factors, which differ from
structure to structure. They can act as viewports, much like the Salk Institute
creating that iconic view of the Pacific Ocean. The meeting of the building to
the edge and how it continues around the corner is so subtle that the viewer
isn’t necessarily concerned with how but rather what is created by the corner. The
shape of a structure can also determine how it turns a corner. For instance, a
structure could possibly introduce the viewer to an area with a simple curve
the eases them around the corner rather than a sharp 90-degree turn. It can
most certainly do the opposite as well, gradually forcing the viewer away from
the area.
Material is another characteristic
that can easily manipulate how the building turns a corner. I always viewed
turning a corner as either an entrance or an exit. I think within the last few
steps before a viewer turns a corner and sees what is beyond the end of the
building, creates an opportunity to introduce the viewer to what awaits. By
using a material that is dominant beyond the corner itself, the viewer is able
to anticipate what they will be exposed in terms of material use.
Which do you think came first, the building or the street?
ReplyDelete