Zaha Hadid was quoted: “It
is about no 90°
corners. The diagonal was the beginning of
all this. The diagonal created the idea of the explosion reforming space. That
was an important discovery.” The “explosion reforming space” that Hadid refers
to and her use of “no 90° corners” is manifest
in what Hadid’s long time-collaborator, Patrik Schumacher calls
“Parametricism.” Where Modernism was founded on the idea of space, Hadid
believes Parametricism is a differentiation of fields. “Fields are full, as if
filled with a fluid medium… we might think of liquids in motion, structured by
radiating waves, laminal flows, and spiraling eddies” (Schumacher).
In Hadid’s work, such as in her design
of MAXXI in Rome, her utilization of the diagonal is demonstrated clearly. The
building turns the corner in a fluid fashion. The turn is volumetric, and
offers a sense of spatial continuity. From the exterior, the continuity is
expressed positively, and vice versa on the interior. The way MAXXI turns the
corner illustrates the idea of free flowing forms and the intention for the
building to reinterpret the existing urban grid at its site. Instead of corners
marking the boundary or end of a space such as in many examples of modern architecture, the diagonal corners of MAXXI imply a continuation of motion
through Hadid’s differentiation of fields.
Can you be more specific...to which non 90 degree corner are you referring? And, just for clarity's sake, there are an abundance of 90 degree corners in that project.
ReplyDelete