The way a building meets the ground is one of the
important aspects of architecture. The
way the building meets the ground can tell us a lot about the building we are
looking at. For instance in a lot of H.H.
Richardson’s work, the lower part of the building bulges out and sits firmly on
the ground. This helps to emphasize the
massiveness, and the size and weight of the building. When you look at one of his buildings, as you
see the bottom part of the building bulging out at the thicker bottom, you get
a real good sense of the massiveness and weight of the building. If for instance, the building was situated
within the landscape, you would maybe read this differently. This is so because you are not seeing how
firmly it stands on the ground and you don’t get a sense of its thickness
either.
Other than the bevel, how else does Richardson express the girth of the building?
ReplyDelete